Publications

Books

  1. Szadkowski, K., & Krzeski, J. (2025). A Marxist Critique of the Ruined University. Springer Nature. DOI
  2. Szadkowski, K. (2023) Capital in Higher Education. A Critique of the Political Economy of the Sector. Palgrave Macmillan. [Link]
  3. Kulczycki, E. (2023) The Evaluation Game. How Publication Metrics Shape Scholarly Communication.  Cambridge University Press [Link]
  4. Kulczycki, E. (2015). Dwa aspekty komunikacji. Założenia komunikologii historycznej  [Two Aspects of Communication. Foundations of Communication History]. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM, pp. 282. http://hdl.handle.net/10593/14086 [in Polish] [PDF]
  5. Szadkowski. K. (2015). Uniwersytet jako dobro wspólne: podstawy krytycznych badań nad szkolnictwem wyższym. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, pp. 360. [in Polish] [PDF]
  6. Kulczycki, E. (2012). Teoretyzowanie komunikacji [Theorizing Communication]. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Instytutu Filozofii UAM, pp. 222. http://hdl.handle.net/10593/2236 [in Polish] [PDF]

Selected Articles in English

2025

  1. Kulczycki, E., Pölönen, J., Laakso, M., & Taşkın, Z. (2025). Learned societies in the academic landscape: Challenges in identifying and categorizing organizations. Scientometrics. DOI
  2. Laakso, M., & Taşkın, Z. (2025). Collaboration in Diamond Open Access publishing. Zenodo. DOI
  3. Pölönen, J., & Kulczycki, E. (2025). Multilingualism is important for all fields of science: Evidence from Finland and Poland. In Language and the Knowledge Economy. Routledge.
  4. Şener, H. S., Kaya, İ. S., Köksal, M. S., & Taşkın, Z. (2025). Closing the door behind: Metric-based research evaluation systems and gatekeeping towards young researchers. Scientometrics, 130(4), 2291–2310. DOI
  5. Szadkowski, K. (2025). For the society as a whole: Higher education and the public good in Poland. Higher Education, 89(1), 259–273. DOI
  6. Taşkın, Z. (2025). Sustaining the “frozen footprints” of scholarly communication through open citations. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. DOI
  7. Vasen, F. (2025). A delicate balance: Responsible evaluation, tenure review, and the pursuit of institutional innovation. Science and Public Policy, scaf003. DOI

2024

  1. Antonowicz, A., Bijak, F., Dziundzio, A., Małecki, D., Mitka, P., Parulski, P., Pupiec, M., Szadkowski, K., & Wilczyńska, G. (Eds.). (2024). Kamionka zostaje. Heterodox.
  2. Kasztalska, A., & Swatek, A. (2024). The dynamic role of the English language in contemporary Poland. World Englishes, 43(2), 301–314. DOI
  3. Krawczyk, F. (2024). Book review: Ash Vatansever and Aysuda Kölemen (eds.) (2022), Academic freedom and precarity in the Global North: Free as a bird. Learning and Teaching, 17(3), 134–137. DOI
  4. Krawczyk, S. (2024). Disciplinary responses to the rise of English in metrics-driven social sciences and humanities. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 0(0), 1–13. DOI
  5. Lewandowska, K., Ochsner, M., & Kulczycki, E. (2024). Research quality criteria in the Creative Arts. Studies in Higher Education, 1–15. DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2023.2248174 [PDF]
  6. Mochocki, M., Krawczyk, S., & Mochocka, A. (2024). Polish history up to 1795 in Polish games and game studies. Games and Culture, 15554120241228490. DOI
  7. Taşkın, Z. (2024). Sürdürülebilir Bilimsel İletişim için Açık Atıf Verisi. Türk Kütüphaneciliği, 38(2). DOI

2023

  1. Bowker, L., Ayeni, P., & Kulczycki, E. (2023). Linguistic privilege and marginalization in scholarly communication: Understanding the role of new language technologies for shifting language dynamics. DOI
  2. Koza, Z., Lew, R., Kulczycki, E., & Stec, P. (2023). Who Controls the National Academic Promotion System: An Analysis of Power Distribution in Poland. SAGE Open. DOI: 10.1177/21582440231177974 {PDF}
  3. Krzeski, J. (2023a). In-against-beyond metrics-driven university: A Marxist critique of the capitalist imposition of measure on academic labor. In R. Hall, I. Accioly, & K. Szadkowski (Eds.), The Palgrave International Handbook of Marxism and Education (pp. 163–182). Springer. DOI
  4. Krzeski, J., Szadkowski, K., & Kulczycki, E. (2023). Ustanawianie ewaluacyjnej homogeniczności: Konflikty wokół Wykazu czasopism naukowych z 2019 roku. Kwartalnik NAUKA, 4. Link
  5. Taşkın, Z., Krawczyk, F., & Kulczycki, E.  Are papers published in predatory journals worthless? A geopolitical dimension revealed by content-based analysis of citations. Quantitative Science Studies, 1–24. doi: 10.1162/qss_a_00242 [PDF]
  6. Doğan, G., Taşkın, Z., Kulczycki, E., Szadkowski, K. How Inclusive Are the International Conferences? Attending Conferences in an Unequal World. In: Information for a Better World: Normality, Virtuality, Physicality, Inclusivity. iConference 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13971. Springer, Cham. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-28035-1_37 [Link]
  7. Krzeski, J.  Power and agency within the evaluative state: A strategic–relational approach to quantification of higher education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 1-14. doi: 10.1080/00131857.2022.2162388 [PDF]

2022

  1. Krzeski, J., Szadkowski, K., & Kulczycki, E. (2022). Creating evaluative homogeneity: Experience of constructing a national journal ranking. Research Evaluation, DOI: 10.1093/reseval/rvac011 [PDF]
  2. Kulczycki, E., & Rotnicka, S. (2022). Consequences of Participating in Questionable Academia: A Global Survey of Authors of Journal Articles and Conference Presentations. 26th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators (STI 2022), Granada, Spain, 7-9 September 2022. DOI: 10.5281/ZENODO.6960060 [PDF]
  3. Doğan, G., Taşkın, Z., Kulczycki, E., & Pölönen, Janne. (2022). What makes top 20 JIF journals ‘top’?: Exploring characteristics of journals indexed in the Journal Citation Reports. 26th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators (STI 2022), Granada, Spain, 7-9 September 2022. DOI: 10.5281/ZENODO.6906891 [PDF]
  4. Kulczycki, E., Huang, Y., Zuccala, A. A., Engels, T. C. E., Ferrara, A., Guns, R., Pölönen, J., Sivertsen, G., Taşkın, Z., & Zhang, L. (2022). Uses of the Journal Impact Factor in national journal rankings in China and Europe. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, asi.24706. DOI: 10.1002/asi.24706 [Preprint]  [Link] 
  5. Lewandowska, K., Kulczycki, E., & Ochsner, M. (2022). Evaluation of the arts in performance-based research funding systems: An international perspective. Research Evaluation, DOI: 10.1093/reseval/rvac017 [PDF]
  6. Szadkowski, K., & Krzeski, J. (2021). Conceptualizing capitalist transformations: Marx’s relevance for higher education research. Critique 50(1): 185-203. DOI: 10.1080/03017605.2022.2050536 [Link] [Preprint]
  7. Kulczycki, E., Hołowiecki, M., Taşkın, Z., & Doğan, G. (2022). Questionable conferences and presenters from top-ranked universities. Journal of Information Science. DOI: 10.1177/01655515221087674 [PDF]
  8. Taşkın, Z., Taşkın, A., Doğan, G., & Kulczycki, E. (2022). Factors affecting time to publication in information science. Scientometrics, 1-17. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-022-04296-8 [PDF]
  9. Swatek, A. M., Taşkın, Z., & Jackson, N. C. Revisiting “Family Matters”: How Citation Patterns in the Journal of Second Language Writing Reveal the Changing Nature of the Second Language Writing Field and the Decreasing Role of Composition Studies in It. DOI: 10.37514/JWA-J.2022.6.1.06 [PDF]
  10. Kowal, M., Sorokowski, P., Kulczycki, E., & Żelaźniewicz, A. (2022). The impact of geographical bias when judging scientific studies. Scientometrics. DOI: doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04176-7 [PDF]
  11. Rodríguez-Fuentes, R. A., & Swatek, A. M. (2022). Exploring the effect of corpus-informed and conventional homework materials on fostering EFL students’ grammatical construction learning. System, 102676. DOI: 10.1016/j.system.2021.102676 [PDF]
  12. Shin, J. Y., Rodríguez-Fuentes, R. A., Swatek, A. M., & Ginther, A. (2022). Aptis test review. Language Testing, 39(1), 172-187. DOI: 10.1177/02655322211032873  [PDF]

2021

  1. Taşkın, Z., Doğan, G., Kulczycki, E., & Zuccala, A. A. (2021). Self-Citation Patterns of Journals Indexed in the Journal Citation Reports. Journal of Informetrics, 15(4), 101221. DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2021.101221 [PDF]
  2. Krawczyk, F., & Kulczycki, E. (2021). On the geopolitics of academic publishing: The mislocated centers of scholarly communication. Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society, 4(1), 1984641. DOI: 10.1080/25729861.2021.1984641 [PDF]
  3. Szadkowski, K. & Krzeski, J. (2021). The common good and academic freedom in Poland. Higher Education Quarterly. DOI: 10.1111/hequ.12349 [Preprint]
  4. Szadkowski, K. (2021). The public good and higher education in Poland. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education. DOI: 10.1080/03057925.2021.1987194 [Preprint]
  5. Krawczyk, S., Szadkowski, K., & Kulczycki, E. (2021). Identifying top researchers in highly metricized academia: Two discursive strategies of senior officials in Poland. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education,1–12. DOI: 10.1080/01596306.2021.1993792 [Link], [Preprint]
  6. Kulczycki, E., Kolasa, W.M. & Szadkowski, K. Marx, Engels, Lenin, and Stalin as highly cited researchers? Historical bibliometrics study. Scientometrics 126,8683–8700 (2021). DOI: 10.1007/s11192-021-04126-3 [PDF]
  7. Kulczycki, E., Hołowiecki, M., Taşkın, Z., Krawczyk, F. Citation patterns between impact-factor and questionable journals. Scientometrics 126, 8541–8560 (2021). DOI: 10.1007/s11192-021-04121-8 [PDF]
  8. Szadkowski, K., Krzeski, J. (2021). The future is always-already now: Instituent praxis and the activist university. Policy Futures in Education. DOI: 10.1177/14782103211003445 [Link]
  9. Lewandowska, K., Kulczycki E. (2021). Lewandowska, K., & Kulczycki, E. (2021). Science policy as implicit cultural policy: Evaluation of the arts in Polish academia. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 27(2), 202–217. DOI: 10.1080/10286632.2021.1873963 [Link]
  10. Zuccala, A. A., Pölönen, J., Guns, R., Røeggen, V., Kulczycki, E., Bruun, K., & Savolainen, E. (2021). Performance-based publisher ratings and the visibility/impact of books: Small fish in a big pond, or big fish in a small pond?. Quantitative Science Studies, 2(2), 588–615. DOI: 10.1162/qss_a_00134 [PDF]
  11. Taşkın, Z. (2021). Forecasting the future of library and information science and its sub-fields. Scientometrics. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-020-03800-2 [PDF]
  12. Petr, M., Engels, T. C., Kulczycki, E., Duskova, M., Guns, R., Sieberova, M., & Sivertsen, G. (2021). Coverage of journal articles in social sciences and humanities in Web of Science and their representation in citation indexes: a comparison of five European countries. PLoS One. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249879 [PDF]
  13. Krawczyk, F., & Kulczycki, E. (2021). How is open access accused of being predatory? The impact of Beall’s lists of predatory journals on academic publishing. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 102271. DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102271 [PDF]
  14. Korytkowski, P., & Kulczycki, E. (2021). The gap between Plan S requirements and grantees’ publication practices.Journal of Informetrics, 15(2), 101156, DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2021.101156 [PDF]
  15. Lewandowska, K., & Kulczycki, E. (2021). Academic research evaluation in artistic disciplines: The case of Poland. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1–13. DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2021.1893651 [PDF]
  16. Pölönen, J., Guns, R., Kulczycki, E., Sivertsen, G., & Engels, T. C. (2021). National lists of scholarly publication channels: An overview and recommendations for their construction and maintenance. Journal of Data and Information Science, 6(1), 50. DOI: 10.2478/jdis-2021-0004 [PDF]

2020

  1. Kulczycki, E., Rozkosz, E. A., Szadkowski, K., Ciereszko, K., Hołowiecki, M., & Krawczyk, F. (2020). Local use of metrics for the research assessment of academics: The case of Poland. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 1–19. DOI: 10.1080/1360080X.2020.1846243 [Link]
  2. Pölönen, J., Laakso, M., Guns, R., Kulczycki, E., & Sivertsen, G. (2020). Open access at the national level: A comprehensive analysis of publications by Finnish researchers. Quantitative Science Studies, 1-33. DOI: 10.1162/qss_a_00084 [PDF]
  3. Doğan, G. & Taşkın, Z. (2020). Humanities: The outlier of research assessments. Information (Special issue ICT Enhanced Social Sciences and Humanities), 11(11), 540. DOI: 10.3390/info11110540 [PDF]
  4. Taşkın, Z. (2020). TÜBİTAK Türkiye Adresli Uluslararası Bilimsel Yayınları Teşvik Programınca desteklenen dergiler üzerine bir değerlendirme: Yayıncı ülkeler ve disiplin farklılıklarına yakından bakış (An evaluation on journals supported by TÜBİTAK Incentive Program for International Scientific Publications: Closer look at the origins and disciplines of the journals). Türk Kütüphaneciliği (Turkish librarianship), 34(2), 135-159. DOI: 10.24146/tk.685967 [Link]
  5. Kulczycki, E. (2020). Guns R., Pölönen J., Engels, C.E., Rozkosz E.A., Zuccala A.A., Bruun. K., Eskola, O., Istenič-Starčič, A., Petr, M., Sivertsen, G. Multilingual Publishing in the Social Sciences and Humanities: A Seven‐Country European Study. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology: asi.24336. DOI: 10.1002/asi.24336 [PDF]
  6. Kulczycki, E., Korytkowski P. (2020). Researchers publishing monographs are more productive and more local-oriented. Scientometrics. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-020-03376-x [PDF]
  7. Antonowicz, D., Kulczycki, E., Budzanowska, A. (2020). Breaking the deadlock of mistrust? A participative model of the structural reforms in higher education in Poland. Higher Education Quaterly.1–19. DOI: 10.1111/hequ.12254 [Link]

2019

  1. Szadkowski, K. & Krzeski, J. (2019) In, Against, and Beyond: A Marxist Critique for Higher Education in Crisis, Social Epistemology, 33:6, 463-476, DOI: 10.1080/02691728.2019.1638465 [Link]
  2. Giménez-Toledo, E., Mañana-Rodríguez, J., Engels, T. C. E., Guns, R., Kulczycki, E., Ochsner, M., … Zuccala, A. A. (2019). Taking scholarly books into account, part II: A comparison of 19 European countries in evaluation and funding. Scientometrics, 118(1), 233–251. doi: 10.1007/s11192-018-2956-7 [Link]
  3. Korytkowski, P., & Kulczycki, E. (2019). Examining how country-level science policy shapes publication patterns: The case of Poland. Scientometrics, 119(3), 1519–1543. doi: 10.1007/s11192-019-03092-1 [PDF]
  4. Korytkowski, P., & Kulczycki, E. (2019). Publication counting methods for a national research evaluation exercise. Journal of Informetrics, 13(3), 804-816. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2019.07.001 [PDF]
  5. Kulczycki, E. (2019). Field patterns of scientometric indicators use for presenting research portfolio for assessment. Research Evaluation, 28(2), 169–181. doi: 10.1093/reseval/rvy043 [Link]
  6. Kulczycki, E., & Korytkowski, P. (2019). What share of researchers publish monographs? In 17th International Conference on Scientometrics & Informetrics: ISSI 2019: With a Special STI Indicators Conference Track: Proceedings (Vol. 1, pp. 179-184). Rome: Edizioni Efesto. [PDF]
  7. Kulczycki, E., Rozkosz, E. A., & Drabek, A. (2019). Internationalization of Polish Journals in the Social Sciences and Humanities: Transformative Role of The Research Evaluation System. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 44, 9–30. doi: 10.29173/cjs28794 [PDF]
  8. Kulczycki, E., Rozkosz, E. A., Engels, T. C. E., Guns, R., & Hołowiecki, M. (2019). How to identify peer-reviewed publications: Open-identity labels in scholarly book publishing. PLoS ONE, 14(3), e0214423. doi: 0.1371/journal.pone.0214423 [PDF]
  9. Pölönen, J., Guns, R., Kulczycki, E., Laakso, M., & Sivertsen, G. (2019). Open access challenge at the national level: comprehensive analysis of publication channels used by Finnish researchers in 2016-2017. In 17th International Conference on Scientometrics & Informetrics: ISSI 2019: With a Special STI Indicators Conference Track: Proceedings (Vol. 2, pp. 1776-1787). Rome: Edizioni Efesto. [PDF]
  10. Sivertsen, G., Guns, R., Kulczycki, E., & Pölönen, J. (2019). The use of Gold Open Access in four European countries: An analysis at the level of articles. In17th International Conference on Scientometrics & Informetrics: ISSI 2019: With a Special STI Indicators Conference Track: Proceedings (Vol. 2, pp. 1600–1605). Rome: Edizioni Efesto. [PDF]
  11. Szadkowski, K. (2019). An Autonomist Marxist Perspective on Productive and Unproductive Academic Labour. TripleC, 17(1), 111–131. [PDF]
  12. Szadkowski, K. (2019). The Common in Higher Education: A conceptual approach. Higher Education, 78(2), 241–255. doi: 10.1007/s10734-018-0340-4 [PDF]
  13. Vanholsbeeck, M., Demetriou, T., Girkontaite, A., Istenic Starcic, A., Keiski, V., Kulczycki, E., … Vehovec, M. (2019). Senior academics as key negotiators in the implementation of impact policies in the social sciences and humanities. Fteval: Journal for Research and Technology Policy Evaluation, 48, 9. doi: 10.22163/fteval.2019.371 [PDF]

2018

  1. Engels, T. C. E., Istenič Starčič, A., Kulczycki, E., Pölönen, J., & Sivertsen, G. (2018). Are book publications disappearing from scholarly communication in the social sciences and humanities? Aslib Journal of Information Management, 70(6), 592–607. doi: 10.1108/AJIM-05-2018-0127 [PDF]
  2. Kulczycki, E. (2018). The diversity of monographs: Changing landscape of book evaluation in Poland. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 70(6), 608–622. doi: 10.1108/AJIM-03-2018-0062 [Link]
  3. Kulczycki, E., Engels, T. C. E., Pölönen, J., Bruun, K., Dušková, M., Guns, R., … Zuccala, A. (2018). Publication patterns in the social sciences and humanities: Evidence from eight European countries. Scientometrics, 116(1), 463-486. doi: 10.1007/s11192-018-2711-0 [PDF]
  4. Kulczycki, E., & Korytkowski, P. (2018). Redesigning the Model of Book Evaluation in the Polish Performance-based Research Funding System. Journal of Data and Information Science, 3(4), 60–72. doi: 10.2478/jdis-2018-0021 [PDF]
  5. Ochsner, M., Kulczycki, E., & Gedutis, A. (2018). The Diversity of European Research Evaluation Systems. In R. Costas, T. Franssen, & A. Yegros-Yegros (Eds.), 23rd International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators (STI 2018) (pp. 1235–1241). Leiden: Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS).
  6. Pölönen, J., Auranen, O., Engels, T., & Kulczycki, E. (2018). Taking national language publications into account: The case of the Finnish performance-based research funding system 1. In R. Costas, T. Franssen, & A. Yegros-Yegros (Eds.), 23rd International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators (STI 2018) (pp. 204–211). Leiden: Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS).
  7. Sīle, L., Pölönen, J., Sivertsen, G., Guns, R., Engels, T. C. E. E., Arefiev, P., … Teitelbaum, R. (2018). Comprehensiveness of national bibliographic databases for social sciences and humanities: Findings from a European survey. Research Evaluation, 27(4), 310–322. doi: 10.1093/reseval/rvy016 [PDF]

2017

  1. Kulczycki, E. (2017). Assessing Publications through a Bibliometric Indicator: The Case of Comprehensive Evaluation of Scientific Units in Poland. Research Evaluation, 26(1), 41–52. doi: 10.1093/reseval/rvw023 [PDF]
  2. Kulczycki, E., Engels, T. C. E., & Nowotniak, R. (2017). Publication patterns in the social sciences and humanities in Flanders and Poland. In 16th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics (ISSI 2017) (pp. 95–104). Wuhan: Wuhan University. http://hdl.handle.net/10593/19753 [PDF]
  3. Kulczycki, E., Korzeń, M., & Korytkowski, P. (2017). Toward an excellence-based research funding system: Evidence from Poland. Journal of Informetrics, 11(1), 282–298. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2017.01.001 [Link]
  4. Kulczycki, E., & Rozkosz, E. A. (2017). Does an expert-based evaluation allow us to go beyond the Impact Factor? Experiences from building a ranking of national journals in Poland. Scientometrics, 111(1), 417–442. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2017.01.001 [PDF]
  5. Sorokowski, P., Kulczycki, E., Sorokowska, A., & Pisanski, K. (2017). Predatory journals recruit fake editor. Nature, 543, 481-483. doi: 10.1038/543481a [Link]

2016

  1. Kulczycki, E. (2016). Rethinking Open Science: The Role of Communication. Annals of the University of Craiova – Philosophy Series, 37(1), 81–97. http://hdl.handle.net/10593/14864 [PDF]
  2. Szadkowski, K. (2016). Socially necessary impact/time: notes on the acceleration of academic labor, metrics and the transnational association of capitals. Teorie vedy/Theory of Science, 38(1), 53–86. [PDF]
  3. Szadkowski, K. (2016). Towards an Orthodox Marxian Reading of Subsumption(s) of Academic Labour under Capital. Workplace: A Journal for Academic Labor, 28, 9–29. https://ices.library.ubc.ca/index.php/workplace/article/view/186210/185388 [PDF]

2014

  1. Kulczycki, E. (2014). Communication History and Its Research Subject. Annals of the University of Craiova – Philosophy Series, 33(1), 132–155. http://hdl.handle.net/10593/11301 [PDF]
  2. Kulczycki, E. (2014). On the Development of Scholarly Communication: A Philosophical Approach to the Communication History. Studia Philosophica Wratislaviensia, 4 (English Edition), 51–63. http://hdl.handle.net/10593/12605 [PDF]
  3. Kulczycki, E. (2014). On the philosophical status of the transmission metaphor. Central European Journal of Communication, 7(2), 175–188. http://hdl.handle.net/10593/12487 [PDF]
  4. Szadkowski, K. (2014). The Long Shadow of Doctoral Candidate Status: Case Study-Poland. Social Work and Society, 12(2), 1–17. [PDF]

Selected Articles in Polish

2023

  1. Kulczycki, E., Zambrano Mena,Y.A., Krawczyk, F. Budowa i charakterystyka Korpusu Polskich Czasopism Naukoznawczych. Zagadnienia Informacji Naukowej. 61(2), 9–31. DOI: 10.36702/zin2023.02.01 [Link]

2022

  1. Smolarska, Z., Lewandowska, K., & Kulczycki, E. (2022). Artyści wobec kultury audytu. Wpływ systemu ewaluacji nauki na uczelnie artystyczne. Nauka, 3/2022 DOI: 10.24425/NAUKA.2022.140348. 109-131. [PDF]

2021

  1. Kulczycki, E., Polityczna ingerencja w Wykaz czasopism naukowych. Dlaczego wykazy muszą być w rękach naukowców. Nauka, 2/2021, 39–77. DOI: 10.24425/nauka.2021.136315 [PDF]
  2. Kulczycki, E., Hołowiecki, M., Taşkın, Z., & Krawczyk, F. (2021). Drapieżne czasopisma są legitymizowane przez artykuły w czasopismach z impact factor. Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny, 83(2), 59-82. DOI: 10.14746/rpeis.2021.83.2.5 [PDF]

2020

  1. Krawczyk, F. (2020). Geopolityka drapieżnych czasopism: pozorne centra w globalnym systemie produkcji wiedzy. Nauka(2020): 133-149. [PDF]

2019

  1. Ciereszko, K. (2019). Hierarchiczna struktura akademii w mediach społecznościowych dla naukowców: Studium przypadku Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu. Nauka, 2, 161–173. doi: 10.24425/nauka.2019.129238 [PDF]
  2. Kulczycki, E. (2019). Książkowe publikacje naukowe w europejskich systemach ewaluacji nauki. Nauka, 2, 29–45. doi: 10.24425/nauka.2019.126190 [PDF]

2017

  1. Kulczycki, E. (2017). Dlaczego warto inwestować w humanistykę? Zagadnienia Rodzajów Literackich, 60(3), 193–195. doi: 10.26485/ZRL/2017/60.3/13 [PDF]
  2. Kulczycki, E. (2017). Kariera drapieżnych czasopism – przypadek Anny O. Szust. Nauka, 3, 71–83. http://www.nauka-pan.pl/index.php/nauka/article/view/732 [PDF]
  3. Kulczycki, E. (2017). Otwarta nauka a komunikacja – perspektywa metateoretyczna. In E. Kulczycki (Ed.), Komunikacja naukowa w humanistyce (pp. 67–86). Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Instytutu Filozofii UAM. http://hdl.handle.net/10593/17589 [PDF]
  4. Kulczycki, E. (2017). Punktoza jako strategia w grze parametrycznej w Polsce. Nauka i Szkolnictwo Wyższe, 1(49), 63–78. http://hdl.handle.net/10593/18153 [PDF]
  5. Kulczycki, E. (2017). Wprowadzenie: Wyzwania instytucjonalnej ewaluacji nauki. Nauka i Szkolnictwo Wyższe, 1, 7–15. doi: 10.14746/nisw.2017.1.0 [PDF]

2016

  1. Antonowicz, D., Brdulak, J., Hulicka, M., Jędrzejewski, T., Kowalski, R., Kulczycki, E., … Kwiek, M. (2016). Reformować? Nie reformować? Szerszy kontekst zmian w szkolnictwie wyższym. Nauka, 4, 7–33. http://hdl.handle.net/10593/18151 [PDF]
  2. Kulczycki, E. (2016). Ocena humanistyki w świetle wyzwań Narodowego Programu Rozwoju Humanistyki. Zagadnienia Naukoznawstwa, 52(1), 149–162. http://hdl.handle.net/10593/14863 [PDF]
  3. Kulczycki, E., Rozkosz, E. & Drabek, A. (2016). Ocena ekspercka jako trzeci wymiar ewaluacji krajowych czasopism naukowych. Nauka, 1, 35–58. http://hdl.handle.net/10593/14247 [PDF]
  4. Drabek, A., Rozkosz, E., Hołowiecki, M., & Kulczycki, E. (2015). Polski Współczynnik Wpływu a kultury cytowań w humanistyce. Nauka i Szkolnictwo Wyższe, 2(46), 121–138. doi: 10.14746/nsw.2015.2.4 [PDF]

2015

  1. Kulczycki, E., Drabek, A., & Rozkosz, E. A. (2015). Publikacje a zgłoszenia ewaluacyjne, czyli zniekształcony obraz nauki w Polsce. Nauka, 3, 35–58. http://hdl.handle.net/10593/13832 [PDF]
  2. Kulczycki, E., Rozkosz, E., & Drabek, A. (2015). Publikacje polskich badaczy w czasopismach z list ERIH w kontekście ewaluacji jednostek naukowych. Kultura i Edukacja, 107(1), 149–72. doi: 10.15804/kie.2015.01.08 [PDF]

2014

  1. Kulczycki, E. (2014). Zasady oceny czasopism humanistycznych i ich rola w parametryzacji jednostek naukowych. Nauka, 3, 117–140. [PDF]

2013

  1. Kulczycki, E. (2012). Wykorzystanie mediów społecznościowych przez akademickie uczelnie wyższe w Polsce: Badania w formule otwartego notatnika. In E. Kulczycki & M. Wendland (Eds.), Komunikologia: Teoria i praktyka komunikacji (pp. 89–109). Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Instytutu Filozofii UAM.  [PDF]

Edited volumes

  1. Engels, T.C.E., Kulczycki, E. (Eds.), Handbook on Research Assessment in the Social Sciences, Edwar Elgar Publishing, 2022 (544 pages). [Preprints]
  2. Kulczycki, E. (Ed.). (2017). Komunikacja naukowa w humanistyce. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Instytutu Filozofii UAM, pp. 328. http://hdl.handle.net/10593/17589 [PDF]
  3. Sowa, J. & Szadkowski, K. (Eds.). (2011). Edu-factory: samoorganizacja i opór w fabrykach wiedzy. Kraków: Korporacja Ha!art, pp. 326. http://hdl.handle.net/10593/14156 [PDF]

Reports

  1. Kulczycki, E. (2019). Procedury ewaluacji czasopism, współczynniki wpływu i listy czasopism (Seria Raportów Centrum Studiów nad Polityką Publiczną UAM, No. 8). Poznań: Centrum Studiów nad Polityką Publiczną UAM. http://hdl.handle.net/10593/24448 [PDF]
  2. Kulczycki, E. (2019). Procedury ewaluacji jednostek podstawowych i instytucji (Seria Raportów Centrum Studiów nad Polityką Publiczną UAM, No. 7). Poznań: Centrum Studiów nad Polityką Publiczną UAM. http://hdl.handle.net/10593/24449 [PDF]
  3. Kulczycki, E. (2019). Wzory publikacyjne polskich naukowców w latach 2013–2016. Nauki humanistyczne i nauki społeczne. doi: 10.6084/m9.figshare.7797527 [PDF]
  4. Kulczycki, E. (2018). Stan praktyk publikacyjnych polskich czasopism naukowych w 2017 roku. doi: 10.6084/m9.figshare.5683813 [PDF]
  5. Drabek, A., Rozkosz, E. A., Kulczycki, E. (2017). Analiza opóźnień wydawniczych polskich czasopism naukowych (Raport no. 3). Poznań: Scholarly Communication Research Group. doi: 10.6084/m9.figshare.4578394. [PDF]
  6. Hołowiecki, M. (2017). Analiza widoczności publikacji naukowych polskich humanistów w Internecie (Raport no. 4). Poznań: Scholarly Communication Research Group. doi: 10.6084/m9.figshare.5368915 [PDF]
  7. Kulczycki, E. (2017). Procedury instytucjonalnej ewaluacji nauki (Raport no. 7). Poznań.
  8. Drabek, A., Rozkosz, E. A., Hołowiecki, M., Kulczycki, E. (2016). Raport z analizy bibliometrycznej. „Pamiętnik Literacki” i „Diametros – An Online Journal of Philosophy” (Raport Scientometrics PRG, No. 1). Poznań: Scientometrics PRG. doi: 10.6084/m9.figshare.2074285.v4. [PDF]
  9. Rozkosz, E. A., Kulczycki, E. (2016). Polskie czasopisma z nauk humanistycznych i nauk społecznych w liczbach (Raport Scientometrics PRG, No 2). Poznań: Scientometrics PRG. doi: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3840957. [PDF]
  10. Kulczycki, E. (2014). Uczelnie wyższe na Twitterze: Raport 2014. doi: 1​0​.​6​0​8​4​/​m​9​.​f​i​g​s​h​a​r​e​.​8​9​9​816 [PDF]